AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
Sally Durgerian
September 04, 2003 01:38PM
Hi George,
You might try a deconvolution analysis in which you have 3 stimfiles corresponding to the onset of set size 1 trials, set size 3 trials and set size 5 trials. Estimate each IRF using a minlag of 0 and a maxlag of however many TRs it takes to get 10 seconds past the probe. You'll get an IRF, for many areas, which has two peaks, one corresponding to the encoding period and one to the probe period. You could then compare the area under each of the two peaks, or compare various intervals within the IRF. In our experience, although the sternberg effect of response latency is observed in the probe period, differences in activation by set size are predominantly found during the encoding period.
Sally

Subject Author Posted

AFNI analysis of SIRP scan

George He August 20, 2003 10:14AM

Re: AFNI analysis of SIRP scan

bob cox August 23, 2003 12:52PM

Re: AFNI analysis of SIRP scan

george he August 25, 2003 05:58PM

Re: AFNI analysis of SIRP scan

Sally Durgerian September 04, 2003 01:38PM