AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
bob cox
December 17, 2003 02:52PM
When using waver with the -tstim option and giving the event times from a file, but not specifying the a:b syntax for event duration, does waver assume that the event duration is actually 1 TR as specified in -dt?

Not exactly. As the output of waver -help tries to explain, if an input to -tstim is a pure number, then the result is a impulse response to an infinitely rapid event at that time. If the input is of the form a:b, then the result is the sum of a bunch of impulse responses spread out over the time from a to b. These will not quite be the same.

You can see this by doing the following 2 commands:

waver -dt 1.0 -tstim 5:6 -GAM -numout 20 | 1dplot -stdin &
waver -dt 1.0 -tstim 5 -GAM -numout 20 | 1dplot -stdin &

The graphs are similar but not identical. In particular, you'll see that the first one (with the stimulus spread out over 1 second) is slightly delayed from the second one. This is as it should be.

For practical purposes, though, you'd never be able to tell these two responses apart with FMRI data. So I recommend that you do a pair of plots like the above for the cases that you care about, and you'll probably find that you won't care about the tiny differences.

bob cox

Subject Author Posted

waver event duration

Luiz Pessoa December 17, 2003 11:39AM

Re: waver event duration

Gang Chen December 17, 2003 02:31PM

Re: waver event duration

bob cox December 17, 2003 02:52PM

Re: waver event duration

Gang Chen December 18, 2003 10:20AM