AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
February 12, 2004 09:11AM
Dear experts,

we are studying amputee patients, scanned at different points in time. For each patient, we would hope (!!) to observe variations in the activation due to cortical reorganization.
Here comes the problem: we see differences in the activation maps even for the healthy hand, where we expect no major reorganization. We can lower the threshold until the maps look exactly alike, but at the same threshold the maps are quite different. The session with the smaller activation "looks" noisier, and this might account for the difference we see. This, of course, prevents us from saying anything sensible about cortical reorganization.


We understand that there is no real solution for this (oh, imaging dilemmas!), but we are wondering if there might be a way to approach the problem statistically, quantifying the noise level and correcting for it, or whatever enlightened minds can come up with.

thank you!
cristina

Subject Author Posted

extension of activation: effects of image noise

cristina saccuman February 12, 2004 09:11AM

Re: extension of activation: effects of image noise

Ziad Saad February 13, 2004 01:29PM