AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
Ziad Saad
February 13, 2004 01:29PM
Hello Cristina,

There is no magical solution as you realize. There is quite a bit of variability in the volume or extent of activation in BOLD. Forgive me for tooting my horn, but you might find this paper of interest: "The Spatial Extent of the BOLD Response" Neuroimage 19, 2003 pp 132-144.
But even if you have a large variance, you can still tell the difference in activation volume between the two groups however that might require a large number of subjects.

Speculations:
1- Another approach that I suggest you try is to focus on a few regions of interest and ignore the rest of the brain. Perhaps by doing so, you can lower your threshold far enough (because of the smaller number of multiple comparisons) where the patterns of activation are less variable. But that all depends on the noise levels you are dealing with.

2- Also, you might want to try looking at changes in the spatial patterns (rather than volumes) between the two groups. You'll still need to restrict this analysis to small ROIs. See Jim Haxby's paper: "Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex", Science, Vol 293, Sept 01.


cheers,
-ziad
Subject Author Posted

extension of activation: effects of image noise

cristina saccuman February 12, 2004 09:11AM

Re: extension of activation: effects of image noise

Ziad Saad February 13, 2004 01:29PM