AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
February 17, 2004 10:44PM
I was wondering what the interpretations of the following ANOVA setups would be:

SETUP A:
-a levels --> 8 one for each timepoint that you estimated in the deconvolution
-b levels --> 2 one for each task
-c levels --> 10 one for each subject
fixed, fixed, and random effects for the levels, respectively

SETUP B:
-a levels --> 8 one for each timepoint that you estimated in the deconvolution
-b levels --> 2 one for each task
fixed and fixed effects for the levels, respectively


The a level factor is setup to determine the brain voxels that have significant signal modulation.
The b level factor is setup to look at task differences
Thus, the a level factor alone is relevant and the interaction is relevant because it would identify the voxels where the tasks are different over time.

The question I have is is there any advantage or disadvantage to either setup. It seems that SETUP A might be better because it takes subject differences into account. Any input would be appreciated.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Also. 3dANOVA4 seems like it would be very beneficial to projects that look at group differences.
Subject Author Posted

3dANOVA....

Donald McLaren February 17, 2004 10:44PM

Re: 3dANOVA....

Gang Chen February 18, 2004 10:31AM

Re: 3dANOVA....

Donald February 19, 2004 01:05PM

Re: 3dANOVA....

Gang Chen February 19, 2004 01:47PM