AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 01, 2004 02:20PM
Hi Gang!

Thanks for your clear reply.
The only thing, which is not clear to me is question four:
4) I used the '-bucket 0 name' option, because I found the other ones to difficult to understand. How should I look at my data. I have b0 and b1 subbriks and corresponding t-statistics. There is also a R2 and F-stat subbrik. It says in the manual that b0 and b1 would not so much differ. Only the colorizing would change.

You replied:
First, the estimate of b0 and that of b1 are usually different, as you have noticed, because one is the constant and other is the slope of the linear dependence relationship. As people are mostly not interested in the inference of intercept b0, no statistic values are provided for b0 in AFNI output; Instead the statistic values of the linear regression, same thing as the ones for slope estimate b1, are given in the dataset.

My question:
I am not sure, if I understood you right? AFNI is putting out a t-statistic for b0 and another one for b1 + a F-stat. When I look at b0 (intensity + corresponding t-stat), regions are lightening up, which also showed up in my mixed effects model (3dANOVA3) with reasonable p-values. Anatomically and functionally they would make sense to me. However, as you noted it is the intercept and I do not really know, what this could mean? When I look at b1+corresponding t-stat I get less activation, lower p-values and most important of all at location, which look more than artifacts and not like results I should take serious.
So, I am puzzeled. Could you give me some more advice.

Thanks,

Lukas
Subject Author Posted

Questions about behavioral data

Lukas Pezawas February 28, 2004 10:09PM

PS

Lukas Pezawas February 29, 2004 07:11PM

Re: Questions about behavioral data

Gang Chen March 01, 2004 01:55PM

Re: Questions about behavioral data

Lukas Pezawas March 01, 2004 02:20PM

Re: Questions about behavioral data

Gang Chen March 01, 2004 04:11PM

Re: Questions about behavioral data

Lukas Pezawas March 01, 2004 05:44PM

Re: Questions 3

Lukas Pezawas March 01, 2004 02:24PM

Re: Questions about behavioral data

Wolfgang Gaggl March 03, 2004 10:31AM

Re: Questions about behavioral data

Lukas Pezawas March 03, 2004 11:52AM