AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 04, 2004 09:46AM
Hi Giovanni,

Yes, changing the nfirst value should change the results.
You are deciding on the first time series value to use in
the deconvolution procedure.

From a cursory glance at the code, it is not clear what
effect a smaller nfirst value would have. For stimulus
type with a maxlag value greater than the nfirst value,
one might worry that those first time points won't have
complete data for evaluation, e.g. with nfirst = 2, and
minlag/maxlag = 0/6, there are 3 time points missing in
order to fully evaluate time point 2.

It may be a good idea to use nfirst = 0, or it may not.
To me, either case may have a reasonable chance of being
correct. But I suspect only the author of the program,
Doug Ward, knows well enough to say.

- rick

Subject Author Posted

3dDeconvolve option (nfirst)

Giovanni March 03, 2004 11:04AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve option (nfirst)

Gang Chen March 03, 2004 08:31PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve option (nfirst)

Giovanni March 04, 2004 05:31AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve option (nfirst)

rick reynolds March 04, 2004 09:46AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve option (nfirst)

kate murray July 09, 2004 02:28PM