> I don't really understand why you want to "combine" the two statistical
> briks.

I guess I'm trying to make a shortcut. If I have two sets of briks
that produce individual stats (a ttest, say), you might say it's
probably better to combine the two sets into one statistical
computation (an anova, perhaps).

I'm looking for a quick test (other than a side-by-side visual
comparison) that will tell me if the results of two different ttests
are the same (or rather, where they are both significant). I figured
something along the lines of converting to p values, thresholding, and
multiplying. I don't need a new statistic. I was thinking that was
what the fizt_t2p(t) et al. things were for.

Dr. Tom Holroyd
"A man of genius makes no mistakes. His errors are volitional and are
the portals of discovery." -- James Joyce

------------------------------------------
Posted to Phorum via PhorumMail