AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
Ziad S. Saad
May 06, 2005 03:06PM
Hello Oori,

That is because -surf_A specifies the name of the surface as it exists in the spec file. In fact, -surf_A does not have to be fully specified. For example if in the spec file you have a surface called LH_WHITE and one called LH_GRAY , you can just use -surf_A WHITE or -surf_A GRAY to load lh_WHITE and lh_GRAY, respectively. Do not use -surf_A LH_ however because that string does not uniquely identify one surface (you have in this example 2 surfaces that begin with LH_ ).

cheers,
-ziad
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

SurfSmooth problem with full-path argument

Oori May 05, 2005 07:57PM

Re: SurfSmooth problem with full-path argument

Ziad S. Saad May 06, 2005 03:06PM

Re: SurfSmooth problem with full-path argument

Oori May 08, 2005 04:03PM