AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
January 27, 2007 10:24AM
George,

I can think of 4 different methods to handle the data if you have multiple runs.

(1) Average

This probably applies to simple experiments such as block designs. Other than this restrictive condition, it is also less kosher in terms of trend modeling.

(2) Concatenate all runs and treat cross-run events the same

This approach assumes no cross-run variation for the same event class. In the end you have one beta for each event class.

(3) Concatenate all runs but treat cross-run event class as separate regressor

Now you can model cross-run variation of the same event type, and you would get multiple beta's for each event class. But you still assume the residual errors (noise) share the same structure across runs since they are pooled and averaged across runs in the model. Also you need to have enough sample size for each event class in each run. The mutliple beta's will be averaged in group analysis.

(4) Analyze each run separately (no concatenation)

You get multiple beta's for each event type without most of the above assumptions except that you need to have enough sample size for each event class in each run. The mutliple beta's will be averaged in group analysis.

Gang
Subject Author Posted

concatenate or not?

george January 26, 2007 03:12PM

That is the question

Gang Chen January 27, 2007 10:24AM

Re: That is the question

george January 29, 2007 11:11AM

Re: That is the question

Gang Chen January 30, 2007 11:40AM

Re: That is the question

Pallavi Rane November 19, 2009 07:02PM

Re: That is the question

James November 20, 2009 12:28PM

Re: That is the question

Gang Chen November 20, 2009 12:37PM