AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
February 14, 2007 02:05PM
Bonnie,

In answer to your second question of "is this a problem?": it depends. The scaling of the reference function will affect the scaling of your fit coefficients after 3dDeconvolve. For example, if your reference function went from 0 to 100, then fit coefficients will be 100x larger than if the reference function went from 0 to 1. As long as you are using the same reference function for all your subjects, then this constant scaling factor won't make a difference when you get to group analysis. If, however, you want to compare fit coefficients between conditions whose reference functions are scaled differently, there will be a problem. The main place where this causes trouble, actually, is when people are making "subject-specific" reference functions based on subjects' trial-by-trial behavior. Then, if the scaling of each person's reference functions is different it will throw off the group analysis. When I make subject-specific reference functions, I normalize each wavered reference function to go from 0 to 1 by dividing by the max value. I do this in Excel, but I know others have developed programs to do it, and for all I know, there's now an AFNI program to help with this...

Hope this helps.

Lisa Eyler
Subject Author Posted

Waver peak problem?

Bonnie February 14, 2007 12:49PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Giorgio Ganis February 14, 2007 01:05PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Lisa T. Eyler February 14, 2007 02:05PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Ziad Saad February 14, 2007 02:30PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Bonnie February 14, 2007 02:48PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Ziad Saad February 15, 2007 09:36AM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Stephanie McMains September 17, 2007 05:39PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Gang Chen September 17, 2007 06:08PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

rick reynolds September 17, 2007 08:50PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Colm Connolly February 15, 2007 07:14AM