History of AFNI updates  

|
February 14, 2007 02:05PM
Bonnie,

In answer to your second question of "is this a problem?": it depends. The scaling of the reference function will affect the scaling of your fit coefficients after 3dDeconvolve. For example, if your reference function went from 0 to 100, then fit coefficients will be 100x larger than if the reference function went from 0 to 1. As long as you are using the same reference function for all your subjects, then this constant scaling factor won't make a difference when you get to group analysis. If, however, you want to compare fit coefficients between conditions whose reference functions are scaled differently, there will be a problem. The main place where this causes trouble, actually, is when people are making "subject-specific" reference functions based on subjects' trial-by-trial behavior. Then, if the scaling of each person's reference functions is different it will throw off the group analysis. When I make subject-specific reference functions, I normalize each wavered reference function to go from 0 to 1 by dividing by the max value. I do this in Excel, but I know others have developed programs to do it, and for all I know, there's now an AFNI program to help with this...

Hope this helps.

Lisa Eyler
Subject Author Posted

Waver peak problem?

Bonnie February 14, 2007 12:49PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Giorgio Ganis February 14, 2007 01:05PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Lisa T. Eyler February 14, 2007 02:05PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Ziad Saad February 14, 2007 02:30PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Bonnie February 14, 2007 02:48PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Ziad Saad February 15, 2007 09:36AM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Stephanie McMains September 17, 2007 05:39PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Gang Chen September 17, 2007 06:08PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

rick reynolds September 17, 2007 08:50PM

Re: Waver peak problem?

Colm Connolly February 15, 2007 07:14AM