History of AFNI updates  

|
April 25, 2007 12:38PM
Forget to mention the comparison of quality of normalization/warp between SPM & afni:
In SPM, warping EPI images to TT_EPI+tlrc template ( come from afni and change into nii format): when use fsl bet2 to remove the skull, EPI alignment with EPI template is very good.
In afni, use @auto_tlrc script to warp EPI images to TT_EPI+tlrc:
with its own skull strip or using fsl bet2 skull-striping and no_ss option, the alignment is OK with obvious mismatch at occipital and frontal regions.

Maybe the way I am using afni to warp EPI is not correct. But I also try the old way (warp T1 anatomy to T1 template and then adwarp EPI images, does work very well either due to image distortion & subject motion). Hope someone have a better solution.
Subject Author Posted

+orig after preprocessing with SPM?

barbara Cerf-Ducastel April 23, 2007 05:00PM

Re: +orig after preprocessing with SPM?

ziad April 24, 2007 09:09AM

Re: +orig after preprocessing with SPM?

barbara Cerf-Ducastel April 24, 2007 06:25PM

Re: +orig after preprocessing with SPM?

Guofan April 25, 2007 12:27PM

Quality of Warping between SPM & AFNI

Guofan April 25, 2007 12:38PM

Re: Quality of Warping between SPM & AFNI

Gregory R Samanez-Larkin March 03, 2008 02:05PM

Re: Quality of Warping between SPM & AFNI

ziad March 04, 2008 10:05AM

Re: Quality of Warping between SPM & AFNI

Gregory R Samanez-Larkin March 04, 2008 04:49PM

Re: Quality of Warping between SPM & AFNI

ziad March 05, 2008 01:32PM