AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
October 15, 2007 10:59AM
Hi Long,

It is highly recommended to remove all of the modeled parameters
at once (baseline, motion, stim classes), not piece by piece.
Use 3dDeconvolve to do this.

3dDetrend will remove as much of the motion parameters as it can
to make the best least squares fit to your data. In your case,
since 99% of your data has been subtracted out by that operation,
you are essentially claiming that 99% of your signal is due to
the motion parameters, which is of course, not the case. Did you
remove the polynomial baseline there, too?

It might be much better to let 3dDeconvolve decide how much of
your data is baseline, motion and stimulus response, using just a
single least squares solution.

---

It should not be necessary to orthogonalize the motion parameters,
since you probably do not care to evaluate the results of those
regressors. More likely, you just want them modeled and removed.

- rick

Subject Author Posted

motion parameters

Long Xiangyu October 13, 2007 12:05PM

Re: motion parameters

rick reynolds October 15, 2007 10:59AM

Re: motion parameters

Long Xiangyu October 16, 2007 07:27AM

Re: motion parameters

rick reynolds October 17, 2007 11:16AM