AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
January 09, 2008 01:37PM
Ziad/others,

I'm having some inconsistent results using SurfClust. Specifically, I've generated a conjuction dset at a few different nominal p-values and would like to (1) apply a threshold to the conj. maps & (2) output a surface dset clustered appropriately.

So, for my conj. map generated at p=.05, the following command works beautifully:

SurfClust \
-spec CW_BVspec.spec \
-surf_A CW_anat_inhom_crop_SAG_TRF_TAL_RH_RECOSM.srf \
-input CW_Conjposneg_srf_05.niml.dset 0 \
-thresh_col 0 \
-athresh 14.99 \
-rmm 1 \
-amm2 576 \
-no_cent \
-out_clusterdset

However, when I try to apply a similar command to the conj. map generated at other p-values, I get an error. Here's an example command (followed by the resulting error):

SurfClust \
-spec CW_BVspec.spec \
-surf_A CW_anat_inhom_crop_SAG_TRF_TAL_RH_RECOSM.srf \
-input CW_Conjposneg_srf_01.niml.dset 0 \
-thresh_col 0 \
-athresh 14.99 \
-rmm 1 \
-amm2 211 \
-no_cent \
-out_clusterdset

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvSurface #1/1(Local Domain Parent), loading ...
Warning SUMA_SurfaceMetrics_eng: SO->MF != NULL and thus appears to have been precomputed.

Fatal Signal 11 (SIGSEGV) received
SUMA_Sort_ClustersList
SurfClust
Bottom of Debug Stack
** AFNI version = AFNI_2007_05_29_1644 Compile date = Jan 9 2008
** Program Abort **

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Adam

Subject Author Posted

SurfClust problem

Adam Greenberg January 09, 2008 01:37PM

Re: SurfClust problem

uncle January 09, 2008 01:53PM

Re: SurfClust problem

Adam Greenberg January 09, 2008 02:09PM

Re: SurfClust problem

ziad January 10, 2008 12:12PM

Re: SurfClust problem

Adam January 10, 2008 02:20PM