AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
ziad
December 30, 2008 12:10PM
Hi Woogul,

If I understand correctly, you are looking for a way to say that LSTG responds after RSTG during the 'previously won' condition.
While the ROI averages hint that there **may** be a delay difference, it is a stretch to state that the delay difference reflects neuronal delays. It is quite possible that the delay differences reflect vascular differences between these areas.
You might start to have a story however, if you have a task that activates these same regions but without the delay difference or with a difference in the opposite direction.
How you estimate delay differences is another topic that requires more reflection on your experiment and your data processing. But I would not embark on this until you are sure that these differences are not of vascular origins.

cheers,
ziad
Subject Author Posted

time couse analysis of activated regions

Woogul Lee December 29, 2008 08:05PM

Re: time couse analysis of activated regions

ziad December 30, 2008 12:10PM