AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
Bob Cox
January 06, 2009 08:58AM
A. We don't know, but I doubt that it will make much difference. If it does, then your results are probably too weak to withstand serious scrutiny.

B. I don't understand the "really move to be alligned [sic]" question. As for using motion.1D in 3dDeconvolve, you are probably right -- it wouldn't help much. But it probably wouldn't hurt much either.

If you have an experiment with significant intra-TR motion so that you want to try 2dimreg first, then you probably have bad data.
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

Two question about 3dvolreg

Zareal Wang January 06, 2009 03:38AM

Re: Two question about 3dvolreg

Bob Cox January 06, 2009 08:58AM

Re: Two question about 3dvolreg

Zareal Wang January 06, 2009 09:53AM

Re: Two question about 3dvolreg

Zareal Wang January 06, 2009 08:14PM

Re: Two question about 3dvolreg

Zareal Wang January 06, 2009 09:58AM