AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
giuseppe pagnoni
January 26, 2009 01:16PM
Dear all,

I have some datasets acquired with a *very* oblique prescription (and with only a few slices) and I have some theoretical questions for which I could use some better informed judgment:

1) It seems to me that the motion correction algorithm would perform better when applied *before* any de-obliquing, right?

2) Similarly, if one plans to use the estimated motion parameters as confounds in a linear model (3dDeconvolve), and assuming that motion correction has been performed on the original images (non de-obliqued), it seems to me that the linear model would be better estimated on the images *before* a spatial registration to a template (MNI or Talairach). Unless the amount of variance in the observed data explained by the set of motion parameters is somehow invariant under affine transformation of the data...

any thoughts?

thanks

g.
Subject Author Posted

(oblique) theoretical questions

giuseppe pagnoni January 26, 2009 01:16PM

Re: (oblique) theoretical questions

rick reynolds January 26, 2009 01:41PM

Re: (oblique) theoretical questions

giuseppe pagnoni January 27, 2009 11:50AM