AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
January 26, 2009 01:41PM
Hi Giuseppe,

1. It should not matter. Motion correction is done to a base image.
If all images are shifted and rotated by the same amount in the
de-oblique step (which they should be), the only difference to the
correction would be the effect of possibly an extra resampling step.

2. This might make a small difference, but again I expect it not to
really matter. A stretching factor might end up giving slighly
different weights to different regions of the datasets, say. But
in the end, the difference should be small.

Note that in each case, the same transform (de-oblique or +tlrc)
is applied to every sub-brick of the EPI or statistical datasets.
Therefore one would expect basically the same relative transformation
to be needed for EPI to EPI-base alignment.

Also note that if the motion parameters are scaled or shifted by a
constant (and the data does not change), it will have no effect on
the statistics or the other beta weights.

- rick

Subject Author Posted

(oblique) theoretical questions

giuseppe pagnoni January 26, 2009 01:16PM

Re: (oblique) theoretical questions

rick reynolds January 26, 2009 01:41PM

Re: (oblique) theoretical questions

giuseppe pagnoni January 27, 2009 11:50AM