AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
February 24, 2009 05:02PM
Well, as you've already realized, there is basically no perfect solution whether or when slice timing correction should be performed. This is some guideline I've seen:

If TR is relatively small (<= 2 seconds, for instance), slice timing correction is probably unnecessary since the acquisition time between two consecutive volumes is negligible. If TR > 2 sec and head motion is significant, try head motion correction first and then slice timing correction. If TR > 2 sec and head motion is small, go with the reverse order. If head motion is unknown, run slice timing correction first for interleaved scanning and go with the other way around for sequential images.

Gang
Subject Author Posted

slice timing correction and motion correction

Daniel Goldenholz February 24, 2009 08:36AM

Re: slice timing correction and motion correction

Gang Chen February 24, 2009 05:02PM

Re: slice timing correction and motion correction

Daniel Goldenholz February 26, 2009 09:57PM

Re: slice timing correction and motion correction

Daniel Glen February 28, 2009 09:50AM