AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
Aditya
March 03, 2009 01:43AM

Okay, more newbie questions. As always, please tell me to RTFM (with a link please ;) if that's the solution.

I'm trying to use 3dmaskave:

3dmaskave -mask Lamyg1_Ramyg2+tlrc -quiet -mrange 1 1 scan1_norm+tlrc

*** Input and mask datasets are not same dimensions!

Okay so I figure I'll resample my amygdala to the same anat that the dataset was aligned to. As an aside, that gives me a strange warning:

adwarp -apar ../002_at+tlrc -dpar Lamyg1_Ramyg2+tlrc -prefix amygdala_resampled -force...
++ Warning: -apar & -dpar are in same +view!
*+ WARNING: Over-writing dataset ./amygdala_resampled+tlrc.HEAD

It shouldn't be "overwriting" anything, because that's a new file.

Anyway -- perhaps unsurprisingly -- using the resampled amygdala doesn't resolve the warning about having different dimensions. My intuition that both being in Talairach coordinates (that's the "+view" referred to in adwarp, right?) is sufficient to align two bricks is apparently wrong.

If it helps, the following underlay/overlay pairs look fine in afni:

TT_N27 / original amygdala
002_at+tlrc / original amygdala
002_at+trlc / scan1_norm+tlrc

Neither anatomical "works" with the resampled amygdala (as in, I don't see the two blobs I expect anywhere). And clearly the original amygdala doesn't "work" with the scan data, in the sense that 3dmaskave thinks they're not aligned.

Where have I gone wrong?

Thanks a million!
Aditya
Subject Author Posted

3dmaskave and image dimensions

Aditya March 03, 2009 01:43AM

Re: 3dmaskave and image dimensions

rick reynolds March 03, 2009 09:44AM

Re: 3dmaskave and image dimensions

Aditya March 05, 2009 05:11PM

Re: 3dmaskave and image dimensions

David Perlman March 05, 2009 07:04PM

Re: 3dmaskave and image dimensions

Aditya March 05, 2009 10:28PM

Re: 3dmaskave and image dimensions

David Perlman March 06, 2009 11:27PM

Re: 3dmaskave and image dimensions

Aditya Prasad March 07, 2009 04:17AM