AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
April 14, 2009 02:00AM
Hello folks,

I hope you can answer a few questions about align_epi_anat.py, which I haven't been able to figure out from the documentation.

The help for the script gives the following example:

# align anat to sub-brick 5 of epi+orig. In addition, do slice timing
# correction on epi+orig and register all sub-bricks to sub-brick 5
# (Sample data files are in AFNI_data4/sb23 in sample class data)
# Note the intermediate file, the volume registered EPI dataset,
# is **not** saved unless the -save_vr option is also used.
# See the -save_xxx option section of this help for more information.

align_epi_anat.py -anat sb23_mpra+orig -epi epi_r03+orig \
-epi_base 5

1) Even if none of the -save_xxx flags are used, will epi_r03+orig have been slice-time and motion-corrected after running the script? That is implied, since the help says the -save_xxx flags are only necessary for saving out intermediate steps, not the results of the script's operations.

2) Assuming that the answer to 1) is yes, will align_epi_anat.py update the history of epi_r03+orig to indicate that it has been slice-time and motion corrected (possibly also de-obliqued and co-registered to anatomical)?

3) Can you confirm which transformations are applied simultaneously, and which are performed sequentially by the script? From reading the help, I conclude that slice-time correction is first, and that a second step combines motion correction, obliquity correction (if needed), and co-registration (if using -epi2anat). Is that accurate?

Thanks,

Jeff
Subject Author Posted

more confusion over align_epi_anat.py

Jeffrey Phillips April 14, 2009 02:00AM

Re: more confusion over align_epi_anat.py

Daniel Glen April 14, 2009 12:37PM

Re: more confusion over align_epi_anat.py

Jeff Phillips April 14, 2009 01:30PM

Re: more confusion over align_epi_anat.py

Daniel Glen April 14, 2009 03:54PM