AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
April 22, 2009 11:07AM
Yes, either could happen if the polort is too small.

It is easiest to imagine with constant and linear, but
let's go up just one degree. Suppose you have assumed
a linear baseline, but there is a strong U-shape to it
(quadratic, say).

The model fit will probably go right through the middle
of the data. The fit parameters could be garbage, and
the error could be huge (meaning the stats will be ~0).

Ignoring the really bad stats, the beta weights could
be tiny or huge. Maybe betas of 20% signal change will
happen to fit the U shape better. Who knows?

---

Fortunately the baseline does not tend to fluctuate so
wildly, but it helps to make the point. Modelling the
baseline accurately is important.

Of course, with too many parameters one can over-model
the data, also leading to garbage... :)

- rick

Subject Author Posted

warnings

Jana April 21, 2009 05:03AM

Re: warnings

rick reynolds April 21, 2009 09:13AM

Re: warnings

Jana April 21, 2009 02:24PM

Re: warnings

rick reynolds April 21, 2009 02:46PM

Re: warnings

Jana April 22, 2009 02:04AM

Re: warnings

Jana April 22, 2009 02:10AM

Re: warnings

James Keidel April 22, 2009 07:33AM

Re: warnings

Jana April 22, 2009 08:46AM

Re: warnings

James Keidel April 22, 2009 09:28AM

Re: warnings

rick reynolds April 22, 2009 09:59AM

Re: warnings

Jana April 22, 2009 10:45AM

Re: warnings

rick reynolds April 22, 2009 11:07AM

Re: warnings

Jana April 23, 2009 03:12AM