AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 18, 2009 10:10AM
Hi Nick,

Ziad wrote this script years ago, when SureFit was a stand-alone program that used the lower left corner of the bounding box as the origin. Since then, SureFit functions (including segmentation) have been merged into Caret, which looks at things from a more coordinate system point of view than the old SureFit, which was more slice-based.

The params file's AC[xyz] and whole volume counterparts aren't set, because John Harwell didn't code Caret to store everything SureFit used to.

But the fact that the origin has moved from the lower left corner of the bounding box to the +tlrc origin is the biggest source of your error.

The exact steps needed to get around this problem aren't crystal clear to me at this point, but I am reminded of a visit to NIH in February 2006, when Ziad made a small change to Vecwarp for me, which he annotated in the usage like so:

N.B.-1: For those using SureFit surfaces created after
the SureFit/Caret merger (post. 2005), you need
to use the flag -new_surefit. Talk to Donna about
this!

I think we need the -new_surefit equivalent in @SUMA_Make_Spec_Caret.

If you email me off-list, I can send you my upload link, so I can look at your dataset.

Donna
Van Essen Lab
Subject Author Posted

surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Nick Oosterhof May 17, 2009 01:20PM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Donna Dierker May 18, 2009 10:10AM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

ziad May 18, 2009 10:27AM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Donna Dierker May 18, 2009 10:37AM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Nick Oosterhof May 18, 2009 01:39PM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Donna Dierker May 18, 2009 04:40PM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Nick Oosterhof May 19, 2009 09:49AM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Nick Oosterhof May 20, 2009 10:35AM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Matt Cieslak July 08, 2009 04:39PM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

ziad July 09, 2009 04:18PM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Matt Cieslak July 10, 2009 11:11AM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

ziad May 21, 2009 10:42AM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Nick Oosterhof May 21, 2009 10:51AM