AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 18, 2009 04:40PM
Nick wrote:
>Does that mean that Surefit is not used in combination with SUMA anymore?

No one uses the stand-alone application SureFit anymore, as far as I know -- not since its functions were merged into Caret. But people still use SUMA to display/manipulate their Caret surfaces, though.

>difference vectors based on pairs of nodes in the coord file are different from the difference vectors based on the coordinates that SUMA reports

Sorry, but this isn't clear to me. If you are saying that it doesn't seem to be a simple translation (i.e., the Caret-reported coord differs from the SUMA-reported coord by something other than a fixed +/- offset), then my hunch about the problem source is wrong.

I suggest you, Ziad, and I investigate this problem further off-list. Once we reach resolution, we can post the solution. Someone like Ziad or Rick should make any needed @SUMA_Make_Spec_Caret edits, once we understand what they are.

Donna
Subject Author Posted

surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Nick Oosterhof May 17, 2009 01:20PM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Donna Dierker May 18, 2009 10:10AM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

ziad May 18, 2009 10:27AM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Donna Dierker May 18, 2009 10:37AM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Nick Oosterhof May 18, 2009 01:39PM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Donna Dierker May 18, 2009 04:40PM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Nick Oosterhof May 19, 2009 09:49AM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Nick Oosterhof May 20, 2009 10:35AM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Matt Cieslak July 08, 2009 04:39PM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

ziad July 09, 2009 04:18PM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Matt Cieslak July 10, 2009 11:11AM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

ziad May 21, 2009 10:42AM

Re: surface-volume coordinate transformation problem

Nick Oosterhof May 21, 2009 10:51AM