AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
August 25, 2009 05:02PM

Hi Jim,

Two downsides leap to mind when applying a very large polort.

One is the statistical power in your results. Since each run is
modelled separately, a large polort will chew up degrees of freedom
quickly. For 10 runs with a polort of 3, that uses 40 regressors
and degrees of freedom. If the polort were changed to 15, it would
use 160 degrees of freedom. So your statistics would probably be
deflated.

A potentially bigger problem is if you have a block design, or even
a fast event design that can have some events pile up together. A
high-degree polynomial can match many fluctuations in a signal. So
one might stand a resonable chance of having parts of regressors of
interest being modelled by the polynomial "baseline".

Similarly, if there are just a few events of some class in some run,
a high degree baseline has a chance of modelling such a response.

- rick

Subject Author Posted

polort question

Jodi August 24, 2009 02:56PM

Re: polort question

rick reynolds August 24, 2009 07:54PM

Re: polort question

Jodi August 25, 2009 10:36AM

Re: polort question

rick reynolds August 25, 2009 10:48AM

Re: polort question

Jodi August 25, 2009 11:43AM

Re: polort question

rick reynolds August 25, 2009 12:07PM

Re: polort question

Jodi August 25, 2009 02:50PM

Re: polort question

rick reynolds August 25, 2009 03:20PM

Re: polort question

Jim Bjork August 25, 2009 04:10PM

Re: polort question

rick reynolds August 25, 2009 05:02PM

Re: polort question

Jim Bjork August 26, 2009 06:02AM

Re: polort question

rick reynolds August 26, 2009 10:57AM