AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
November 19, 2009 01:41PM
Hi Andrew,

I would expect the effect of eye movement on motion parameters
to be negligable. Even supposing the eyes did not have the
lower intensities that they usually do have, volume registration
should be dominated by the relatively huge mass that is the brain.

Under what circumstances have you seen eye movement affect volume
registration?

---

Note the way afni_proc.py creates an EPI mask. It uses 3dAutomask
per run, and then takes the union of the results. Note also that
by default it does not even apply this mask, as that often leads to
trouble in group analysis, since each subject will have different
mask coverage. And most people seem to then forget to intersect
these subject masks. And those that remember are often depressed
by the volume of brain that had been removed from the analysis.

So now we do not mask in single-subject space. That step is saved
for a group mask (from the anat or EPI group template).

- rick

Subject Author Posted

Motion Correction Avoiding Eyes

Andrew Jahn November 12, 2009 04:30PM

Re: Motion Correction Avoiding Eyes

Jed Meltzer November 13, 2009 10:09AM

Re: Motion Correction Avoiding Eyes

Andrew Jahn November 19, 2009 01:19PM

Re: Motion Correction Avoiding Eyes

rick reynolds November 19, 2009 01:41PM