AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
Oori
February 22, 2010 10:52AM
Hi Rick.

I take your point! I don't usually smooth time series in the volume so haven't given this much thought.

Two notions come up.. It seems to me that people who smooth time series in the surface domain might not run into this difficulty. Specifically, it seems to me that a workflow in which time series are projected to the surface and those are smoothed there won't run the risk to bringing in data from outside the brain. sumavol2surf will ignore voxels outside the cortex (assuming good alignment between functional and anatomical), and the subsequent smoothing will of course only consider vertices on the surface. In any case it's an interesting issue and i'm tempted to run a few tests to see how our noise behaves.

Second, one way to ignore voxels with low snr (low mean, high var) might be to derive an SNR mask and use the -1filter_blur option in combination with that mask to include in the smoothing only voxels that pass the SNR threshold. That will probably get rid of the potential influence of low SNR voxels anywhere.

Thanks,

Oori
Subject Author Posted

percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Anita Cservenka February 18, 2010 08:38PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 19, 2010 11:42AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Anita Cservenka February 19, 2010 01:20PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Anita Cservenka February 19, 2010 04:19PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 19, 2010 06:44PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Oori February 20, 2010 02:19AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 22, 2010 09:56AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Oori February 22, 2010 10:52AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds February 22, 2010 01:34PM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

Oori March 29, 2010 06:43AM

Re: percent signal change before 3dDeconvolve

rick reynolds March 31, 2010 09:39AM