AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
July 19, 2012 10:47AM
Hey Rick,

I'm confused because I went back and ran afni_proc.py without applying any mask to the first-level models. However, the data should be warped to tailarach space. From what I gathered from the masks section in the afni_proc.py help page, the common strategy is to apply a mask at the group level that is a mask based on the tailarach anatomical template TT_N27+tlrc.
So I tried to include this mask at the group level and got the error that I discussed in my first post on this thread:

FATAL ERROR: -mask doesn't match datasets number of voxels

What is the problem and what should I do instead?
Thanks!!
Mel

afni_proc.py \
-subj_id ${SUBNUM} \
-dsets ${EXPDIR}${SUBNUM}/${RUN1DIR}/${SUBNUM}_r1+orig ${EXPDIR}${SUBNUM}/${RUN2DIR}/${SUBNUM}_r2+orig \
-blocks tshift align tlrc volreg blur mask scale regress \
-copy_anat ${EXPDIR}${SUBNUM}/${T1DIR}/t1+orig \
-execute \
-outlier_count yes \
-tshift_interp -Fourier \
-volreg_align_e2a \
-volreg_tlrc_warp \
-test_stim_files no \
-blur_size 8.0 \
-gen_epi_review review_orig_EPI.txt \
-regress_stim_times ${EXPDIR}${SUBNUM}/onset_files/scan1to2NPB.1D \
${EXPDIR}${SUBNUM}/onset_files/scan1to2NPNB.1D \
${EXPDIR}${SUBNUM}/onset_files/scan1to2PB.1D \
${EXPDIR}${SUBNUM}/onset_files/scan1to2PNB.1D \
-regress_stim_types AM1 AM1 AM1 AM1 \
-regress_stim_labels nopickandbid nopickandnobid pickandbid pickandnobid \
-regress_est_blur_errts \
-regress_opts_3dD -xout -xjpeg designmatrix.jpg -overwrite -tout -fout \
-allzero_OK \
-GOFORIT 10 \
-num_glt 6 \
-glt_label 1 optout-bid -gltsym 'SYM: +nopickandnobid +pickandnobid -pickandbid -nopickandbid' \
-glt_label 2 chosen-notchosen -gltsym 'SYM: +pickandbid +pickandnobid -nopickandnobid -nopickandbid' \
-glt_label 3 Optout-bid_chosen -gltsym 'SYM: +pickandnobid -pickandbid' \
-glt_label 4 Optout-bid_notchosen -gltsym 'SYM: +nopickandnobid -nopickandbid' \
-glt_label 5 Optout -gltsym 'SYM: +pickandnobid +nopickandnobid' \
-glt_label 6 Bid -gltsym 'SYM: +pickandbid +nopickandbid'
Subject Author Posted

mask at group level

lianablair July 11, 2012 03:38PM

Re: mask at group level

Isaac Schwabacher July 11, 2012 04:20PM

Re: mask at group level

rick reynolds July 11, 2012 04:31PM

Re: mask at group level

lianablair July 19, 2012 10:47AM

Re: mask at group level

Peter Molfese July 19, 2012 12:23PM

Re: mask at group level

lianablair July 19, 2012 01:30PM

Re: mask at group level

rick reynolds July 19, 2012 09:09PM

Re: mask at group level

Anonymous User July 20, 2012 10:21AM

Re: mask at group level

gang July 20, 2012 11:38AM