AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
Michael
July 19, 2012 11:49AM
Hello,

I wanted to clarify the result of running gltsym and the difference between the following two scenarios:

1) -gltsym 'SYM: stim1 stim2' -glt_label 1 FullF -fout -tout -rout -bucket 3D-output

and

2) -gltsym 'SYM: stim1 \ stim2' -glt_label 1 FullF -fout -tout -rout -bucket 3D-output

In scenario 1, I get a corresponding coefficent, R^2, and t value for the combination (adding the coefficents of both stim1 and stim2) in the bucket output. The FullF_GLT t-stat is equal to the square root of the FullF_GLT F-stat. But the R^2 does not equal the Full R^2 provided in the output by default, and neither do the FullF_GLT_Fstat and Full_Fstat.

In scenario 2, the default full R^2 value and the glt R^2 equal each other. Also, I get separate glt's t-vaules and coefficents for stim1 and stim2. Its basically duplicate output, with 2 sets of the same full F, R^2, coefficents and t-values.

What accounts for the difference? Essentially, we want to obtain a Full F, parameter estimate and corresponding t-value for the contribution of both stim1 and stim2. Scenario 1 appears to be what we want, no?

Michael
Subject Author Posted

gltsym

Michael July 19, 2012 11:49AM

Re: gltsym

gang July 19, 2012 05:14PM

Re: gltsym

Michael July 20, 2012 02:52PM

Re: gltsym

gang July 20, 2012 04:45PM

Re: gltsym

Michael July 23, 2012 08:54AM

Re: gltsym

gang July 23, 2012 09:39AM

Re: gltsym

Michael July 23, 2012 11:08AM

Re: gltsym

gang July 23, 2012 05:10PM

Re: gltsym

Michael July 25, 2012 09:50AM

Re: gltsym

Michael August 16, 2013 11:20AM

Re: gltsym

gang August 16, 2013 05:18PM

Re: gltsym

Michael August 16, 2013 09:21PM