AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
rick reynolds
July 24, 2012 09:15AM
Hi Oori,

It should be sufficient to apply a mask in SurfSmooth. I have never
tried that out, but if the smoothness is indeed evaluated and applied
within the mask, that would be all you need (along with actually masking
the random noise, though I assume you do that).

SurfClust could use a mask option as well, but it is really not necessary
in this case.

I was going to mention slow_surf_clustsim.py as Peter did. Do you know
how your implementation compares with it?

Note that slow_surf_clustsim.py does not have a mask option, but I could
look into that if it would be useful.

- rick
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

mask-like option for surfclust?

Oori July 24, 2012 02:02AM

Re: mask-like option for surfclust?

Peter Molfese July 24, 2012 07:47AM

Re: mask-like option for surfclust?

rick reynolds July 24, 2012 09:15AM