History of AFNI updates  

|
March 09, 2015 06:47PM
The default cost function, lpc, and several others seem to work well to align epi and anat data, so I suppose you're not aligning the same two things. I used the first sub-brick of the EPI dataset (sub-brick 0). That sub-brick is pre-steady state and has the best contrast. Skullstripping did cut a little off the top, but it did not affect alignment at all. To use the pre-steady state sub-brick as the alignment base in afni_proc.py, consider using the -align_epi_ext_dset option.
Subject Author Posted

align_epi_anat options to skullstrip

tsliu March 06, 2015 11:16AM

Re: align_epi_anat options to skullstrip

Daniel Glen March 06, 2015 12:03PM

Re: align_epi_anat options to skullstrip

tsliu March 08, 2015 04:27PM

Re: align_epi_anat options to skullstrip

Daniel Glen March 08, 2015 06:01PM

Re: align_epi_anat options to skullstrip

tsliu March 09, 2015 05:34PM

Re: align_epi_anat options to skullstrip

Daniel Glen March 09, 2015 06:47PM

Re: align_epi_anat options to skullstrip

tsliu March 10, 2015 09:34AM

Re: align_epi_anat options to skullstrip

Daniel Glen March 10, 2015 12:31PM

Re: align_epi_anat options to skullstrip

tsliu March 10, 2015 05:27PM

Re: align_epi_anat options to skullstrip

Daniel Glen March 10, 2015 06:19PM

Re: align_epi_anat options to skullstrip

tsliu March 11, 2015 02:57PM