History of AFNI updates  

|
April 02, 2015 09:17PM
The default (in uber_subject.py) is to align the EPI:
1. to an EPI base
2. to the anat (inverse of anat to EPI base)
3. to the template (via anat->template xform)

These transformations are catenated and applied
at once, as align_epi_anat.py might do.

Because the EPI gets aligned to the anat, the only
transformation applied to anat_final is to standard
space. Yet everything is aligned at the end.

- rick
Subject Author Posted

is it better to use align_epi_anat.py or use alignment within afni_proc.py?

maitra March 31, 2015 01:43PM

Re: is it better to use align_epi_anat.py or use alignment within afni_proc.py?

rick reynolds March 31, 2015 09:47PM

Re: is it better to use align_epi_anat.py or use alignment within afni_proc.py?

maitra April 02, 2015 06:28PM

Re: is it better to use align_epi_anat.py or use alignment within afni_proc.py?

rick reynolds April 02, 2015 09:17PM

Re: is it better to use align_epi_anat.py or use alignment within afni_proc.py?

maitra April 02, 2015 11:05PM

Re: is it better to use align_epi_anat.py or use alignment within afni_proc.py?

maitra April 03, 2015 04:28PM

Re: is it better to use align_epi_anat.py or use alignment within afni_proc.py?

Isaac Schwabacher April 03, 2015 04:44PM

Re: is it better to use align_epi_anat.py or use alignment within afni_proc.py?

rick reynolds April 07, 2015 08:58AM