AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 23, 2017 06:16PM
Just as a followup regarding MRTrix3 for the FSL format (http://mrtrix.readthedocs.io/en/latest/concepts/dw_scheme.html)

"It is important to note that in this format, the gradient vectors are provided with respect to the image axes, not in real or scanner coordinates (actually, it’s a little bit more complicated than that, refer to the FSL wiki for details). This is a rich source of confusion, since seemingly innocuous changes to the image can introduce inconsistencies in the b-vectors. For example, simply reformatting the image from sagittal to axial will effectively rotate the b-vectors, since this operation changes the image axes. It is also important to remember that a particular bvals/bvecs pair is only valid for the particular image that it corresponds to."

I can output the files in " real formats".
"It is important to note that in this format, the direction vectors are assumed to be provided with respect to real or scanner coordinates. This is the same convention as is used in the DICOM format."

Does the "FSL" or real format match better to 3dAllineate to apply rotation of bvecs?

Thanks,
Ajay
Subject Author Posted

1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

AjaySK April 13, 2017 02:06AM

Re: 1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

ptaylor April 13, 2017 09:22AM

Re: 1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

AjaySK April 13, 2017 05:28PM

Re: 1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

ptaylor April 13, 2017 09:04PM

Re: 1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

AjaySK May 23, 2017 05:53PM

Re: 1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

AjaySK May 23, 2017 06:16PM

Re: 1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

ptaylor May 23, 2017 07:03PM

Re: 1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

AjaySK May 24, 2017 01:39AM

Re: 1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

ptaylor May 24, 2017 08:17AM

Re: 1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

ptaylor May 23, 2017 06:57PM

Re: 1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

Peter Molfese May 24, 2017 11:10AM

Re: 1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

AjaySK May 24, 2017 06:47PM

Re: 1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

AjaySK May 26, 2017 03:56PM

Re: 1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

Peter Molfese May 26, 2017 04:50PM

Re: 1dDW_Grad_O_Mat++ and missing -proc_dset flag

AjaySK July 28, 2017 10:15AM