AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 04, 2018 08:11AM
Hi, 2086--

Yes, that warning is really just a warning so that you know about the data. Always good to know what goes in to the processing, esp. if it might be problematic. Again, you have a b=5 s/mm^2 DWI for your reference-- that effectively has no diffusion info, so that is fine.

But yes, acquisitions really should have several reference volumes with b~0. I don't think that subject with motion in the only reference volume can be used; there are several other volumes with kind-of-low b-values, but I don't think it would be low enough; there is probably too much signal distortion in that subject's b0 to use it, and then those tensor fits would likely be inherently different than others in your group.

The effect of taking all those volumes-- even the very high bvalue ones-- would be to: 1) increase processing time and disk space usage (which is inconvenient, but not inherently a reason not to include them); and 2) probably include some noise along with signal in your tensor fitting from those volumes (which would provide an argument for not including them), in different parts of the brain (the noise floor gets reached differently in different parts of the brain and using different gradient directions, because the magnitude of diffusion would be different). In the AFNI nonlinear tensor fitting, we use a reweighting scheme, and likely the contribution of those volumes would be relatively low. In the TORTOISE RESTORE/iRESTORE tensor fittings, likely contributions from those volumes would also be downweighted. So, you might want to consider/discuss not include b-values greater than, say 1500 s/mm^2. It is a bit of judgment call.

--pt
Subject Author Posted

How to correct DWI EPI distortion with only one b value PA volume? Attachments

EXP.2086 May 02, 2018 10:20PM

Re: How to correct DWI EPI distortion with only one b value PA volume?

ptaylor May 03, 2018 05:59AM

Re: How to correct DWI EPI distortion with only one b value PA volume? Attachments

EXP.2086 May 03, 2018 08:57AM

Re: How to correct DWI EPI distortion with only one b value PA volume?

ptaylor May 03, 2018 01:03PM

Re: How to correct DWI EPI distortion with only one b value PA volume? Attachments

EXP.2086 May 04, 2018 04:33AM

Re: How to correct DWI EPI distortion with only one b value PA volume?

ptaylor May 04, 2018 08:11AM

Re: How to correct DWI EPI distortion with only one b value PA volume? Attachments

EXP.2086 May 24, 2018 11:49AM

Re: How to correct DWI EPI distortion with only one b value PA volume?

ptaylor May 30, 2018 09:38AM

Re: How to correct DWI EPI distortion with only one b value PA volume? Attachments

EXP.2086 May 25, 2018 12:58PM

Re: How to correct DWI EPI distortion with only one b value PA volume?

ptaylor May 30, 2018 10:17AM

Re: How to correct DWI EPI distortion with only one b value PA volume? Attachments

EXP.2086 June 02, 2018 03:39AM

Re: How to correct DWI EPI distortion with only one b value PA volume?

ptaylor June 03, 2018 01:50PM

Re: How to correct DWI EPI distortion with only one b value PA volume?

EXP.2086 May 24, 2018 12:06PM

Re: How to correct DWI EPI distortion with only one b value PA volume?

ptaylor May 30, 2018 10:18AM