Hi Paul,
How to adapt your FATCAT tutorial for HARDI modelling?
I did some try, but not worked very well.
My adaptation start at the "Post-preproc, I: tensor estimation and checking" step.
As the number of my PA volumes is not equal to that of AP, the "ap_proc_DRBUDDI_up_final.nii" is the final output from DR_BUDDI.
# HARDI estimates with DSI studio, with flip chosen from @GradFlipTest
# Get a column of b-value information for DTI-Studio
1dDW_Grad_o_Mat++ \
-in_col_matT $itort/ap_proc_DRBUDDI_up_final.bmtxt \
-unit_mag_out \
-flip_z $my_flip \
-out_col_bval \
-out_col_vec $itort/ap_proc_DRBUDDI_up_final_b_table.txt
After that, I run "do_dsistudio.tcsh" script at FATCAT_DEMO/HARDI with ap_proc_DRBUDDI_up_final.nii.gz+b_table.txt, and got GQI_gfa.nii.gz.
However, the orient of the GFA is different from other dataset mapped to dwi_dwi. This problem can be seen in FATCAT_DEMO/GQI_GFA.nii.gz too:
GQI_GFA.nii.gz
R-to-L extent: -254.000 [R] -to- -0.000 -step- 2.000 mm [128 voxels]
ROI_ICMAP_GMI+orig
R-to-L extent: -129.041 [R] -to- 124.959 [L] -step- 2.000 mm [128 voxels]
Does this affects the tracking results? (But this do affects viewing.)
I tried 3dresample the GQI_GFA to dwi, but the volume still located at the corner.
Or should I map all other dataset to GQI_GFA space?
I tired to ignore this problem, and run 3dTrackID with the uncertainty calced like "Do_07_RUNhardi_uncertainty_est.tcsh" (And is there any new uncertainty estimator?):
3dTrackID \
-mode PROB \
-hardi_gfa GQI_gfa.nii.gz \
-hardi_dirs GQI_dirs.nii.gz \
-netrois fmri_msk_${subj}_GMI.nii.gz \
-uncert Simple_Uncert.nii.gz \
-unc_min_FA 0.0015 \
-dump_rois AFNI \
-alg_Thresh_FA 0.04 \
-alg_Thresh_Frac 0.011 \
-alg_Nseed_Vox 5 \
-alg_Nmonte 1000 \
-prefix fPROB_${subj} \
-nifti -write_opts -overwrite -echo_edu
As the picture see, all negative.
Thank you
2086
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 05/30/2018 09:02AM by EXP.2086.