AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
June 04, 2018 08:59PM
Hi lz,

If the events are 10s and 4s long, the GAM functions will
do a very poor job of modeling them (unless you use a
boxcar-convolved version of GAM). So your basis functions
should be either:

GAM(8.6,0.547,10) and GAM(8.6,0.547,4)
or
BLOCK(10) and BLOCK(4)

or maybe UBLOCK instead of BLOCK

or, if question and answer are never compared, it would
be fine to use BLOCK(10,1) and BLOCK(4,1).


It seems like many options, but if question and answer
are never compared, the BLOCK functions would all lead
to identical group stats, with only a different scaling
of the betas.


The I would say not to use TENT, but to replace GAM with
something more appropriate. TENT would be more work,
and would only be appropriate if you expect shape differences
across subjects or the brain (or if these basis functions should
fail to model the main response, too).

- rick
Subject Author Posted

about the rationale of PPI analysis

lzhyoung May 30, 2018 03:54AM

Re: about the rationale of PPI analysis

rick reynolds June 04, 2018 04:25PM

Re: about the rationale of PPI analysis

lzhyoung June 04, 2018 08:33PM

Re: about the rationale of PPI analysis

rick reynolds June 04, 2018 08:59PM

Re: about the rationale of PPI analysis

lzhyoung June 06, 2018 03:42AM