History of AFNI updates  

|
March 05, 2019 05:14PM
I am beginning to write the script for modeling Valence and Predictability as within-subjects factors, Age and Sex as between-subjects factors, and PCL-5 as a within-subjects quantitative variable (or would PCL-5 be a between-subjects factor if it is a measure of PTSD symptoms that is only measured once?). Below is a sketch of that script. The examples on [afni.nimh.nih.gov] don't quite align with what I want to look at, so I am not sure what -model should look like, if I need to center my qVars, and if I need to spell out each glt. Any thoughts or advice?

3dLME -prefix unc_cl_test -jobs 1
-model "Valence*Predict*PCL5+Age+Sex"
-qVars "Age,Sex,PCL5"
-qVarCenters ""
-ranEff '~1'
-SS_type 3
-num_glt
-gltLabel 1
-dataTable
Subj Valence Predict Age Sex PCL5 InputFile
102_day1 neg p 49.3 m 14 /102_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneg_block+tlrc
102_day1 neu p 49.3 m 14 /102_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneu_block+tlrc
102_day1 neg u 49.3 m 14 /102_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
102_day1 neu u 49.3 m 14 /102_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
104_day1 neg p 24.8 f 35 /104_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneg_block+tlrc
104_day1 neu p 24.8 f 35 /104_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneu_block+tlrc
104_day1 neg u 24.8 f 35 /104_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
104_day1 neu u 24.8 f 35 /104_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
109_day1 neg p 21.7 f 46 /109_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneg_block+tlrc
109_day1 neu p 21.7 f 46 /109_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneu_block+tlrc
109_day1 neg u 21.7 f 46 /109_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
109_day1 neu u 21.7 f 46 /109_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
111_day1 neg p 25.6 m 49 /111_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneg_block+tlrc
111_day1 neu p 25.6 m 49 /111_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneu_block+tlrc
111_day1 neg u 25.6 m 49 /111_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
111_day1 neu u 25.6 m 49 /111_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
119_day1 neg p 44.6 f 26 /119_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneg_block+tlrc
119_day1 neu p 44.6 f 26 /119_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneu_block+tlrc
119_day1 neg u 44.6 f 26 /119_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
119_day1 neu u 44.6 f 26 /119_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
Subject Author Posted

Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 August 24, 2018 05:48PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang August 27, 2018 11:36AM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 March 05, 2019 05:14PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang March 06, 2019 11:35AM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 March 07, 2019 03:18PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang March 07, 2019 09:34PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 April 08, 2019 03:06PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang April 08, 2019 04:19PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 April 09, 2019 09:49AM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 April 15, 2019 04:34PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang April 15, 2019 06:16PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 April 16, 2019 12:00PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang April 16, 2019 10:20PM