Thank you so much Gang!
Feel free to step up to the soap box any time...
Then we will give the rare p < 0.002 (0.001) findings extra weight but we will not through away anything interesting at the higher p-values (e.g. 0.005 with corresponding threshold).
The annoying thing is that it is nice to be able to write "multiple comparsion corrected" in a paper. For example SPS just provides the clusters and claims they are multiple comparsion corrected which is nice for the user (but you are more in the dark of how they did it). If we present a 0.005 finding your simulated alpha is not actually 0.05 and we cannot write that is is multiple comparsion corrected. Right?