AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
October 03, 2019 06:25PM
Hi, Stef-

I am not quite certain why the EPIs wouldn't be processed together... Going back to the initial question you had asked about this, our thoughts were these:
[afni.nimh.nih.gov]
... and I'm not sure why that isn't appealing? One main thing to avoid is having drifts within a segment dominate the overall correlation after being concatenated together.

Having a lower motion censoring limit seems fine. Indeed, one basically does treat naturalistic scanning as resting state, from a processing point of view. The polynomial order seems to be what about the afni_proc.py default is (though I think that one is based on time duration, and not just number of time points).

Re. last question about resting state: yes, you should be able to process your resting state in the same way. You should be able to put both runs into the same script.

--pt
Subject Author Posted

Preprocessing for intersubject correlation

s.meliss April 11, 2019 05:18AM

Re: Preprocessing for intersubject correlation

ptaylor April 12, 2019 03:04PM

Re: Preprocessing for intersubject correlation

s.meliss April 23, 2019 09:25AM

Re: Preprocessing for intersubject correlation

s.meliss July 17, 2019 12:30PM

Re: Preprocessing for intersubject correlation

ptaylor July 17, 2019 01:08PM

Re: Preprocessing for intersubject correlation

s.meliss August 07, 2019 01:27PM

Re: Preprocessing for intersubject correlation

s.meliss September 26, 2019 04:00AM

Re: Preprocessing for intersubject correlation

ptaylor October 03, 2019 06:25PM

Re: Preprocessing for intersubject correlation

s.meliss October 11, 2019 06:39AM