AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
gang
May 31, 2019 06:02PM
> Are "glf" only for variables that have more than 2 factors?

Yes, that's usually the case. However, you don't really have to perform a GLF test. For example, the following

-glfLabel 1 group -glfCode 1 'group : 1*ctrl -1*temp & 1*ctrl -1*front' \

is actually redundant because 3dMVM automatically provide the statistic for it, and it can be more informatively replaced by two separate GLTs:

-gltLabel ? group -gltCode 2 'group : 1*ctrl -1*temp' \
-gltLabel ? group -gltCode 2 'group : 1*ctrl -1*front' \

Gang
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

3dMVM: glt vs. glf

tamtam May 31, 2019 01:31PM

Re: 3dMVM: glt vs. glf

gang May 31, 2019 06:02PM

Re: 3dMVM: glt vs. glf

tamtam June 03, 2019 12:05PM

Re: 3dMVM: glt vs. glf

gang June 05, 2019 10:18AM