AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
June 05, 2019 10:18AM
> would it be incorrect to use glt with 3 factors?

No, there is nothing wrong with your specification because it's indeed a t-test. For example,

-glfLabel 4 3way_inter -glfCode 4 'group : 1*ctrl -1*temp & 1*ctrl -1*front phase : 1*acq -1*rev reinf : 1*corr -1*incor' \

would test the same hypothesis as the three-way interaction F=test that 3dMVM automatically provides except that the F-stat is the corresponding t-stat squared.

Gang
Subject Author Posted

3dMVM: glt vs. glf

tamtam May 31, 2019 01:31PM

Re: 3dMVM: glt vs. glf

gang May 31, 2019 06:02PM

Re: 3dMVM: glt vs. glf

tamtam June 03, 2019 12:05PM

Re: 3dMVM: glt vs. glf

gang June 05, 2019 10:18AM