AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
gang
September 19, 2019 12:05PM
> I noticed that while the magnitude of the response was different for each voxel, the shape of the response
> was the same for all voxels, and seemed to be determined by the shape of the BLOCK function.

That's not surprising at all considering you already fixed each condition with the same shape. With a 20s gap, I would simply start with visualizing the fitted time series, and then try TENTzero for each block separately.

Gang



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/19/2019 12:19PM by Gang.
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

Graph activity within blocks

wped September 18, 2019 06:39PM

Re: Graph activity within blocks

gang September 19, 2019 11:25AM

Re: Graph activity within blocks

wped September 19, 2019 11:50AM

Re: Graph activity within blocks

gang September 19, 2019 12:05PM

Re: Graph activity within blocks

wped September 19, 2019 12:14PM

Re: Graph activity within blocks

gang September 19, 2019 01:29PM