Hi again,

I have run the @SUMA_Make_Spec_FS using -GNIFTI flag. It gave me the meshes std.141 as gii, and used them in my script of SurfSmooth instead of the std.141.lh.smoothwm.asc as shown:


foreach conds ("Nopal" "Norel" "Rel" "Xnopal" "Xnorel" "Xrel")

foreach h (lh rh)

SurfSmooth -spec $SUMA_path/std.141.${subj}_"$h".spec \
-surf_A std.141."$h".smoothwm.gii \
-met HEAT_07 -input $data_path/"$h"_${subj}_decon_$condition.TENT.ave_.niml.dset \
-target_fwhm 6 -Niter -1 \
-output $data_path/"$h"_${subj}_decon_$conds.TENT.ave_.blur6.niml.dset

end

end



But the result was the same as with the previous meshes:

-- Error SurfSmooth (SUMA_SurfSmooth.c:2128):
Failed to get mean fwhm
-- Error SurfSmooth (SUMA_SurfSmooth.c:2128):
Failed to get mean fwhm
-- Error SurfSmooth (SUMA_SurfSmooth.c:2128):
Failed to get mean fwhm
-- Error SurfSmooth (SUMA_SurfSmooth.c:2128):
Failed to get mean fwhm
-- Error SurfSmooth (SUMA_SurfSmooth.c:2128):
Failed to get mean fwhm
-- Error SurfSmooth (SUMA_SurfSmooth.c:2128):
Failed to get mean fwhm
-- Error SurfSmooth (SUMA_SurfSmooth.c:2128):
Failed to get mean fwhm
-- Error SurfSmooth (SUMA_SurfSmooth.c:2128):
Failed to get mean fwhm
-- Error SurfSmooth (SUMA_SurfSmooth.c:2128):
Failed to get mean fwhm
-- Error SurfSmooth (SUMA_SurfSmooth.c:2128):
Failed to get mean fwhm
-- Error SurfSmooth (SUMA_SurfSmooth.c:2128):
Failed to get mean fwhm
-- Error SurfSmooth (SUMA_SurfSmooth.c:2128):
Failed to get mean fwhm


A failure for each condition, so I´m wondering about my data. I attach how it looks the data over the meshes without the smoothing, with the activation bar at 0.25. It looks fine to me, but...