AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
rick reynolds
April 28, 2021 08:16AM
Hi Jenna,

This subject indeed has a fair amount of motion, which is apparent in the volreg radcor images.
Re-running the analysis with more strict censor limits will change those seed-based correlation maps, but it will not alter the radcor ones (censoring is not applied (or even known) for them).

That average censored motion of 0.14 is pretty high. If working with typical motion subjects, we generally drop stubjects if their average censored motion is at least 0.1. If the subjecst are more prone to motion, then one must be more liberal in what is allowed.

- rick
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

Radcor image retains noise after volreg Attachments

jkblujus April 26, 2021 09:48PM

Re: Radcor image retains noise after volreg

ptaylor April 27, 2021 04:18PM

Re: Radcor image retains noise after volreg Attachments

jkblujus April 27, 2021 08:54PM

Re: Radcor image retains noise after volreg

rick reynolds April 28, 2021 08:16AM

Re: Radcor image retains noise after volreg

jkblujus April 28, 2021 03:44PM