AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
August 28, 2003 10:39AM
Hi George,

I am not sure why you felt confused with the two datasets. If you have one anatomy dataset (smaller one with only one subbrick) while the other is functional dataset (usually multiple subbricks), AFNI would automatically load each of them respectively. Switching anatomy would not have any effect on the functional dataset. If this is the case, it is not a bug. If the problem is about two anatomy datasets, it might be a bug then.

The number of stumili would depend on the experimental design, and theoretically you need to consider and model all conditions involved in the experiment. Less stimuli would involve less number of parameter estimations, leading to more degree of freedom for parameter estimation, but you'd better include all the conditions to reflect the real situation.

Regarding hemodynamic response function, yes, different curves would lead to different estimations. There are basically two kinds of choices: (1) hrf type; (2) parameters. Once the hrf type is determined, some parameters (such as power or delay for Gamma variate) might have effect on fitting while others (i.e., -peak) are not really esential.

Cheers,
Gang
Subject Author Posted

sub-brick index and 3dDeconvol again

george he August 27, 2003 05:17PM

Re: sub-brick index and 3dDeconvol again

Gang Chen August 28, 2003 10:39AM

Re: sub-brick index and 3dDeconvol again

george he August 28, 2003 11:49AM

Re: sub-brick index and 3dDeconvol again

rick reynolds August 28, 2003 11:57AM

Re: sub-brick index and 3dDeconvol again

Gang Chen August 28, 2003 12:26PM

Re: sub-brick index and 3dDeconvol again

rick reynolds August 28, 2003 11:51AM

Re: sub-brick index and 3dDeconvol again

george he August 28, 2003 11:59AM

Re: sub-brick index and 3dDeconvol again

bob cox August 29, 2003 09:51AM

Re: sub-brick index and 3dDeconvol again

Sally Durgerian September 04, 2003 01:53PM