AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
Gang Chen
September 23, 2003 05:53PM
I have been reluctant to respond to this question with hoping somebody else would say something.

Assume that you had added enough 0's at beginning to reflect the number (4?) of runs and that you had changed the number of 1's and -1's when you switched from max_lag of 4 to 3. I feel the results are very strange since such a small change of max_lag usually would not lead to a different contrast results. But, without knowing the experiment design and other details, it is hard to say anything about the situation.

Gang
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

more glt

jeremy September 19, 2003 12:44PM

Re: more glt

Gang Chen September 23, 2003 05:53PM

Re: more glt

Jeremy September 24, 2003 02:09AM

Re: more glt

Gang Chen September 24, 2003 11:50AM