AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
January 09, 2004 09:03PM
Ziad and Hauke:
Thanks immensely for the clues on the Min-to-max option, and on the grayscale's context menu -- essential info, and sorry for the "RTFM moment".

That said, I continue to think that the 2%-98% option is broken. I am assuming that the intent here is to map the 2-percentile voxel's intensity to black (or zero) and the 98 percentile voxel's intensity to white (or 255). (Or corresponding position on colorscale).

Examples:

1. Voxels outside that range clip to black and white respectively... and that does happen if for example you have mostly 0, with a few thousand 128's and then a small number of 255's. The 255's appear on screen at same brightness as the 128's.

And the graymap plot corroborates all this so far.

2. But if you have mostly black and just a small number of 255's (presumably less than 2%) then the graymap plot arbitrarily adjusts to a silly configuration: Intensity 0 --> gray-50, intensity 0.5 --> gray-255.

Regardless of whether this is sensible, the few intensity 255 pixels should still appear on screen "clipped" to a gray-255... but they are in fact invisible.

I should note there are some mystery almost-vertical red lines on the graymap plot... not sure what they are supposed to indicate. I thought perhaps they indicated that voxels outside the red lines were ignored completely. This might explain example 2's invisible 255's, but it does not explain why the 255's are visible in example 1.

Anyhow, for the most part we're thoroughy relieved to discover the min-to-max option... but inasmuch as the 2%-98% is the default, it would be nice to know when it's going to surprise us smiling smiley

Graham
Subject Author Posted

AFNI viewer bug -- invisible images

Graham Wideman January 09, 2004 02:46AM

Re: AFNI viewer bug -- invisible images

Graham Wideman January 09, 2004 03:03AM

Re: AFNI viewer bug -- invisible images

Graham Wideman January 09, 2004 03:06AM

Re: AFNI viewer bug -- invisible images

Hauke January 09, 2004 03:23AM

Re: AFNI viewer bug -- invisible images

Ziad Saad January 09, 2004 09:01AM

Re: AFNI viewer bug -- invisible images

Graham Wideman January 09, 2004 09:03PM

Re: AFNI viewer bug -- invisible images

rick reynolds January 10, 2004 11:27AM

Re: AFNI viewer bug -- invisible images

Graham Wideman January 12, 2004 06:08PM

Re: AFNI viewer bug -- invisible images

bob cox January 12, 2004 08:45AM

Re: AFNI viewer bug -- invisible images

Graham Wideman January 12, 2004 06:08PM