AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
Daniel Glen
January 23, 2008 01:39PM
Interesting question, but it's fairly complicated and likely not worth it. We don't have a program or script to do this now. Your data is 1x1x5mm over two orientation directions. The combination of the dataset still will have holes (and fairly large ones) where you don't have data. Add to that the fact this data doesn't cover the same intensity ranges and spatial extents, and it makes this problem very difficult because you will also require good volume registration and intensity normalization between the two. You will be better off reacquiring your structural data at 1x1x1mm.
Subject Author Posted

problems with to3d

Yuhan January 15, 2008 10:29PM

Re: problems with to3d

Daniel Glen January 16, 2008 08:52AM

Re: problems with to3d

Yuhan January 16, 2008 09:21AM

Re: problems with to3d

Daniel Glen January 16, 2008 11:57AM

Re: problems with to3d

Yuhan January 22, 2008 05:11PM

Re: problems with to3d

Daniel Glen January 23, 2008 01:39PM

Re: problems with to3d

Yuhan January 23, 2008 09:06PM

Re: problems with to3d

bob cox January 24, 2008 08:40AM