AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
February 09, 2009 11:15AM
Dear All,

I have a question about the mean beta values.
After getting activated brain regions from the subtraction t-tests, I performed functional ROI (getting beta values of individual participants from each experimental condition in each activated brain region).
But, in some regions, the mean beta values were very small even though the t values of the brain regions were not that small.

For example, in the ACC, the mean beta values of A, B, and C (baseline) conditions were around 0.0012, 0.0025, and 0.0011 respectively.
And, the maximum t value of the B condition - C condition was 5.14.
But, in the the precuneus, the mean beta values of A, B, and C (baseline) conditions were around 0.0007, 0.0003, 0.0001 respectively even though the maximum t value of the A condition 5.53 (not that low).

Could you let me know what the reasons are?
As I remember, the mean beta values are relative values and, as a result, it cannot be compared with each other in terms of the values.
Am I correct?
If it's correct, is it possible to multiply very low mean beta values by some constant?
Please let me know.
Thank you.

Woogul Lee
Subject Author Posted

Mean beta values

Woogul Lee February 09, 2009 11:15AM

Re: Mean beta values

rick reynolds February 09, 2009 11:27AM

Re: Mean beta values

Woogul Lee February 09, 2009 02:02PM

Re: Mean beta values

Woogul Lee February 09, 2009 02:04PM

Re: Mean beta values

rick reynolds February 09, 2009 02:37PM

Re: Mean beta values

Woogul Lee February 09, 2009 02:50PM

Re: Mean beta values

rick reynolds February 09, 2009 03:47PM

Re: Mean beta values

Woogul Lee February 09, 2009 05:13PM

Re: Mean beta values

rick reynolds February 09, 2009 06:40PM

Re: Mean beta values

Woogul Lee February 10, 2009 03:54PM

Re: Mean beta values

rick reynolds February 10, 2009 06:27PM

Re: Mean beta values

Woogul Lee February 10, 2009 07:08PM

Re: Mean beta values

rick reynolds February 11, 2009 09:38AM

Re: Mean beta values

Woogul Lee February 11, 2009 02:20PM